Last December, Google announced partnerships with the Washington Post andew York Times to experiment with theew project, which offers a model that aggregatesews around particular events. For the last two months, the companies have been It seems that the Post and Times only found it mildly interesting, and don't have current plans to continue working with the project. our guess is that they didn't see a lot of changing behavior patterns among their readers.
In some cases, they've built that audience from literallyothing, and haveever gone the route of working for an establishedews site or blog. We think that's a testament to the power of providing compelling content, even if it says bad It turns out that she covers issues regarding scientific practice that are interesting, significant, and rarely discussed elsewhere, so it's one I've kept following. There were aumber of other attendees that We find myself reading
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments
Post a Comment